Archived Fidelity of Implementation (FOI) Webinars
Archived FOI Webinars:
December Forums on Fidelity of Implementation
These forums build on the work of CEMSE’s FOI project and the webinars that took place earlier this year. They will have an interactive format and target specific issues for a range of audiences including current PIs and others engaged in research projects, those developing new proposals and planning research designs, practitioners seeking to learn more about the range of issues pertaining to fidelity, and others interested in fidelity of implementation issues.
DEC 8 2010
Forum 1:
Overview of Fidelity of Implementation Issues for STEM Educators and Researchers
December 8th from 11:00 – 12:30 Central
Presenters:
CEMSE Staff, PIs, Program Officers, Others (TBD)
More information about this session
This forum will target current PIs as well as potential PIs who seek assistance thinking about FOI measurement and analysis. In addition to an orientation to FOI issues and the resources available at Researchers Without Borders, we will invite program officers and grantees to share FOI-related questions in advance of the forum and then choose those that we think will of most common interest to address during the forum We will also take questions from participants during the forum and answer them at that time and/or facilitate discussions about these questions in the Researchers Without Borders community.
This forum has taken place. To watch the archived forum, click here.
DEC 14 2010
Forum 2:
Adaptation versus Fidelity of Implementation: How much is too much?
December 14th, 2010 from 11:00 – 12:30 Central
Presenters:
Karen Base, Gene Hall and Chris Hulleman
More information about this session
With the growing emphasis on evidence-based programs has come an emphasis on enacting programs with fidelity. Some assert that schools and districts must use programs exactly as written. Others, on the other hand, assert that teachers always adapt programs to the contexts and conditions of their classrooms. This forum will include guest discussants Gene Hall, Karen Blase (and others TBN) and will focus on whether adaptations should be allowable and if so, how much and what kind of adaptations are acceptable. It will focus in particular on school district and school level administrators (as well as researchers) and the discussion will address both practical and theoretical aspects of the issue. We will solicit questions from participants in advance and during the live forum.
This forum has taken place. To watch the archived forum, click here.
DEC 17 2010
Forum 3:
FOI at a classroom, school and district level: What are meaningful units of analysis?
December 17th, 2010 from 11:00 – 12:30 Central
Presenters:
Sarah-Kay McDonald (NORC), Iris Weiss (Horizon Research), Enola Proctor
More information about this session
This forum will focus on one of the challenging methodological issues in FOI work – how to use (or not use) classroom level data to draw conclusions about FOI at a school and/or district level. This issue emerges from the fact that implementation is often measured at a classroom level, but outcomes are often reported at a school level. Simply averaging the scores of individual teachers’ implementations may not be an appropriate approach, especially if one can expect a great deal of variability between teachers in a single school. But what is a good approach? This forum will be organized as a problem-solving session. It will begin with brief presentations by each discussant who will share initial thoughts about the problem and ways to address it conceptually and analytically. Following the discussants initial thoughts, we will open the forum to participants to ask specific questions about analytic approaches and share some of their own ideas for the discussants and other participants to respond to.
This forum has taken place. To watch the archived forum, click here.
Archived FOI Webinars:
Summer Webinars on Fidelity of Implementation
Hear more about the webinar series:
For tips on a successful webinar, click here.
May 19 2010
Webinar 1:
Presenter:

Carol O'Donnell
Listen to Carol talk about her webinar:
Education researchers are being asked to conduct rigorous, scientifically based studies of K-12 curriculum interventions; therefore, the need for measuring fidelity of implementation and empirically relating it to outcomes is warranted to ensure internal and external validity.
More information about this session
Few studies guide researchers on how fidelity of implementation to core curriculum interventions can be measured and related to outcomes, particularly within efficacy and effectiveness studies, where the requirements for fidelity measures differ. This webinar attempts to clarify the definition, conceptualization, and measurement of fidelity of implementation and to guide future researchers in understanding how fidelity of implementation can be used to adjust or interpret outcome measures. Six concrete steps for assessing fidelity of implementation in evaluations of educational interventions will be provided.
The slides from this webinar are available here. Watch this webinar.
May 26 2010
Webinar 2:
Presenter:

Sharon Lynch
This webinar is a narrative tracing the development of fidelity of implementation measures for a study of the effectiveness of 3 different middle school science curriculum units.
More information about this session
Initially, the study was based on a theory of change that predicted that student outcomes would be affected by teachers’ ability to find and enact instructional strategies that were embedded in the curriculum materials. However, when similar strategies were found in comparison teachers’ classes, it was clear that better measures of fidelity were needed. The search to find them suggests that the initial theory of change was too simple. Not only are teachers implicated in fidelity of implementation, so too are the middle school students who participated in the curriculum unit’s activities. The suite of fidelity measures helped us to develop a more interesting and complex theory of change about these science curriculum materials and student learning.
The slides from this webinar are available here. Watch this webinar.
Jun 9 2010
Webinar 3:
Presenter:

David Cordray
This webinar will focus on use of theories of change and logical models to identify and measure core components in interventions.
More information about this session
The roles of infidelity in the intervention and control conditions will be discussed, along with the need to assess the “achieved relative strength” of the intervention-control contrast. Approaches to including evidence about fidelity and achieved relative strength into outcome models will also be described and illustrated.
The slides from this webinar are available here. Watch this webinar.
Jul 7 2010
Webinar 4:
Presenters:

Jeanne Century
Listen to Jeanne talk about her webinar:
This webinar will describe work conducted at the Center for Elementary Mathematics and Science Education reform that focuses on the development of a suite of instruments for measuring fidelity of implementation (FOI) across multiple programs.
More information about this session
The webinar will include a description of CEMSE’s conceptual framework that underlies the FOI measurement approach and then will show how that approach is operationalized via a critical component approach to FOI measurement. The webinar will also include a description of how the instruments are customized for each of the programs of the original NSF supported project and how they can also be adapted to other programs.
This webinar has already taken place. The slides from this webinar are available here. Watch this webinar.
You might benefit from reading "A Framework for Measuring Fidelity of Implementation: A Foundation for Shared Language and Accumulation of Knowledge" in the June, 2010 issue of the American Journal of Evaluation prior to the webinar.
Jul 28 2010
Webinar 5:
Considering Fidelity of Implementation from a CBAM perspective: Innovation Configurations
Presenter:

Gene Hall
The Concerns Based Adoption Model (CBAM) has three Diagnostic Dimensions: Stages of Concern (SoC), Levels of Use (LoU), and Innovation Configurations (IC).
More information about this session
Fidelity of implementation is addressed with the IC construct. With IC the operational form, a.ka. “configuration,” of the innovation that is in use by each implementer is determined. The information for determining configurations usually entails a combination of observation, interview, and artifact review. The information is summarized on an Innovation Configuration Map, which is unique to each innovation. Development and use of IC Maps will be the central topic in this webinar.
The slides from this webinar are available here. Watch this webinar.
Other Archived Events
STEM School Webinar Series:
What Is a STEM School?
(Oct.-Nov. 2011)
Sustaining Change in Education
(Sep. 2009)
Check out the interactive agenda to read relevant documents, listen to participants share their points of view, and add your own comments.
